California School Finances

School budgets will be a big issue facing legislators upon their return to Sacramento.

In 2012, voters passed a ballot measure entitled “Temporary Taxes to Fund Education” that, when combined with a rising stock market, sharply boosted school funding (“Proposition 98 Funding”):

Image for post
Image for post

But even that sharp increase in revenue could not keep pace with the torrid rate at which school pension spending grew. E.g., pension spending at the Sacramento City Unified and Fresno Unified School Districts grew two and three times faster than revenues:

Image for post
Image for post

By 2019, the two school districts were spending $174 million on pensions, nearly $1500 per pupil. In addition, the districts spent $69 million, or nearly $1000 per pupil, on OPEB (“Other Post-Employment Benefits”) subsidies for retirees. At nearly $250 million per year, the two districts are now diverting nearly $50,000 per active teacher to retirement costs.

Even before COVID19, school districts were under pressure from retirement costs despite record funding. SacCity was already laying off teachers (last-in, first-out, per current state law). Now, funding for schools is likely to slow or decline while, absent reform, retirement spending will continue to rise. Caught in the middle are students and teachers. GFC looks forward to working with the legislature to protect them.

GFC supports lawmakers who legislate in the general interest.

Written by

Lecturer at Stanford University and president of Govern For California

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store